Larry, Moe and Curly  

Freeonereturns 57F  
490 posts
12/7/2018 9:51 am
Larry, Moe and Curly


So Comey (a completely innocent man) brought two lawyers in with him to testify today. After each question it formed a pattern.
He'd look at both lawyers, half the time one or the other would advise this innocent man will not be answering that question.
The other half where they remained quiet Mr Comey (the blessed and last honorable man on earth) could not recall what ever statement or date or meeting they spoke of.
So after all the and time spent they did find one point of agreement and that's the fact it was a good morning. As they came to such a unity first off this morning.

It's a sad state that I'm not surprised by and expected nothing else.

mse197478 63M  
754 posts
12/7/2018 9:59 am

Why should we think we would get any answers out of him.


Paulxx001 61M
3841 posts
12/7/2018 10:21 am

I admire your passion for all of this stuff. I've tried... and I can't...

Words are like meatloaf- they can be sculpted into any shape you choose.


TheSeeker100 49M
3 posts
12/7/2018 10:30 am

I think the issue isn't whether innocent or guilty, it is what the public fallout will be answering the questions directly. I have noticed, particularly with the associations with Trump, that there is a lack of wanting to be the one who takes a direct shot at the President's credibility.


matutum50 68M
28 posts
12/7/2018 10:53 am

    Quoting TheSeeker100:
    I think the issue isn't whether innocent or guilty, it is what the public fallout will be answering the questions directly. I have noticed, particularly with the associations with Trump, that there is a lack of wanting to be the one who takes a direct shot at the President's credibility.
I think- once a person reaches a high position in government the rules of the constitution should change - they should have to answer the questions put forth, no more taking the 5th, or I can't recall. Trump's credibility is not the issue, ever since Hillary lost it's been destroy Trump. The Hillary email- Uranium One thing hasn't gone away. The dossier- FISHA warrants- Obama/Clinton collusion with Russia- all that stuff , the dems want to hide. Obama wasn't credible with his 75 constitutional violations, passing the Horny.net Care Act which was un constitutional and passed on x-mas eve with no repubs in sight, interesting how the double standard is here. If this illegal acts were done by civilians like us we would be toast.


Trapper69 61G  
2057 posts
12/7/2018 11:05 am

There was a time when those in Washington were honorable, honest, and actually cared about the country and the people.......it's been too long! Now, they only care about how much money they can make!


Freeonereturns 57F  
412 posts
12/7/2018 12:21 pm

    Quoting TheSeeker100:
    I think the issue isn't whether innocent or guilty, it is what the public fallout will be answering the questions directly. I have noticed, particularly with the associations with Trump, that there is a lack of wanting to be the one who takes a direct shot at the President's credibility.
I think Seeker you should seek the correct answer. I assume there are some but I've never seen so many to pile on a person more then Trump. Sadly it doesn't seem to matter if it's the truth or not. Comey is one of those slingers, he'd like nothing more then to hurt Trump who he sees as beneath him.


HowzAboutFun4Us 54M
60 posts
12/7/2018 1:43 pm

This blog is refreshing, to say the least.
Thanks for putting it out there.


pytimesx 58M
610 posts
12/7/2018 2:48 pm

    Quoting TheSeeker100:
    I think the issue isn't whether innocent or guilty, it is what the public fallout will be answering the questions directly. I have noticed, particularly with the associations with Trump, that there is a lack of wanting to be the one who takes a direct shot at the President's credibility.
As Free stated, you should be seeking truth. Its out there and obviously, you've been ignoring all the subterfuge that led up to Comey's termination.

Nortably the mishandling of Clinton email investigation and negligence in making a non-judicial recommendation as Director of the FBI - It was not and has never been the FBI's decision - its made by the DOJ.

For example,

Rosenstein (DOJ) considered (and may have) wearing a wire while talking to Trump
- the email chain released today by CNN (and likely leaked by Democrats) validates this occurred before Comey was terminated.

Rosenstein then advised "President" Trump (at least demonstrate respect for the office) on terminating Comey.

Comey then took notes on Government computers. Upon termination (as Rosenstein advised), Comey leaked that government owned information to his College Professor buddy with intent that the Professor would pass it on to the Media.

As Comey previously testified to Congress, this leak was intended to initiate an internal investigation on "Russian Collusion".

Rosenstein then hired Mueller to execute that Russia Investigation.

In addition, Rosenstein signed the forth and final FISA warrant that started an illegal investigation of the Trump Campaign using the false and widely considered invalid Dossier Clinton and the DNC paid for.

Both the FBI (under Comey) and DOJ (under Lynch/Rosenstein) knew Clinton and the DNC paid for that Dossier to be written as they filed the first through fourth FISA Warrants.

Before the two of them (Comey and Rosenstein) intentionally fabricated false information provided to the FISA Court with the intent of initiating the Russian Collusion Investigation.

The thing is, all of this is and has been reported in the news. So why are you demonstrating pure ignorance to the facts already verified by the FBI & DOJ testimony and written evidence? What do you think is still hidden behind all those redacted email chains?

The latter question is rhetorical but we can presume with all the evidence that has been unearthed that this will take down the entire Democrat Party. That is likely why they've worked so hard - lied so much to brainwash people like you who only consume headlines supporting your assumptions and desires while ignoring the facts that our governments and agencies are corrupt.

Now, why attack President Trump who was never before a politician and had been buddy buddy with the Clintons?

Because during his campaign he promised to clean out the swamp! That means everyone from Obama to the IRS and EPA who had been shaking down firms like the Chicago Mafia (circa 1920-1950s) to the FBI & DOJ.

Time to get your head out of that dark orifice you sit on.
This is our Government of Corruption - and it could (may have) happen to you too.


pytimesx 58M
610 posts
12/7/2018 2:54 pm

Its hilarious Free !

All that fanfare leading up to this hearing and Comey insisting that full transcripts be made available publicly within three days of the testimony - and he has nothing more to say. Surprise he didn't lead with the Fifth....

But he's already stuck his foot in his own mouth. I guess there's nothing more he can or should say.


Become a member to create a blog